Is an Electronic Will a Will?
I recently read an interesting case from the Supreme Court of Queensland called Mahlo v Hehir.
In that case the Deceased had typed on her home computer a document in the form of a Will, two weeks prior to her death. The Will appointed her brother as Executor and allowed for gifts to her parents, along with the balance of her Estate to her son and daughter.
The Will was not signed.
The Deceased had a previous Will made approximately three months earlier, where she appointed her then de facto as Executor and Beneficiary of her Estate.
The Deceased’s children sought an Order from the Court that the electronic document was in fact the Deceased’s last Will, rather than being in a situation where the Deceased’s former de facto was the sole Executor and Beneficiary of her Estate.
The document was an electronic document. The Succession Act allows for an electronic document to be determined as a Will.
There was no evidence of the electronic document being printed. On the face of it the document purported to state the Deceased’s intentions , however, an issue arose as to whether the document was made by the Deceased or her daughter. The issue of testamentary intention therefore became evident.
The Respondent in this matter, Mr Hehir, was a financial planner and neither admitted nor denied that he had drafted the clause in the February Will leaving a residence owned by the Deceased to him.
One month after the February Will, Mr Hehir rented an apartment, however, he continued to sleep at the Deceased’s house.
The Deceased had indicated to other family members that her relationship with Mr Hehir had ended.
Importantly, on 8 May 2008, Mr Hehir emailed the Deceased, attaching a copy of previous Wills indicating that he had recreated her Will for her. Mr Hehir asked the Deceased to send a copy of the Will for him to peruse to ensure that it still met with the legal criteria before resigning it.
There was a lot of evidence lead as to discussions and communications had between the Deceased, family members and Mr Hehir in relation to the electronic Will.
In deciding the question as to whether or not the electronic document was a Will, the Court found:
- The question is whether the electronic document was intended by the Deceased to form her Will;
- The Court was not satisfied that the Deceased intended the electronic document to form her Will. The Court found that the Deceased knew that in making a new Will she had to do more than type or modify a document on a computer. She understood that she had to sign it.
- The Deceased had a fairly recent experience in making a Will, which was signed and witnessed.
- The electronic document made specific provision for where the signature was to appear and be witnessed, and the Deceased had been reminded by Mr Hehir of the necessity for her signature.
- The case was different to the case of Re Trethewey, where the Deceased had said on several occasions that he had left Will on his computer. The Deceased, in this instance had described a paper document as being her Will.
The Court dismissed the claim that the electronic Will formed the last Will of the Deceased. The result of this was that the former de facto benefitted generously from the Deceased’s Estate, over and above the Deceased’s children.
This case serves as a timely reminder to ensure that:
(a) Your Will is updated if personal circumstances change; and
(b) You act quickly to ensure that your Will is prepared properly, with qualified legal advice; and
(c) Your Will is executed promptly to ensure there is no argument as to what your intentions are.
If you have any questions in relation to this particular matter, or finalising your Will, please do not hesitate to contact me.
The information provided in this article is for general information and educative purposes in summary form on legal topics which is current at the time it is published. The content does not constitute legal advice or recommendations and should not be relied upon as such. Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation of this article, Wills, Estates and Probate Lawyers (WEP Lawyers) cannot accept responsibility for any errors, including those caused by negligence, in the material. We make no representations, statements or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information and you should not rely on it. You are advised to make your own independent inquiries regarding the accuracy of any information provided on this website. WEP Lawyers does not guarantee, and accepts no legal responsibility whatsoever arising from or in connection to the accuracy, reliability, currency, correctness or completeness of any material contained in this article. Links to third party websites or articles does not constitute any endorsement or approval of those sites or the owners of those sites. Nothing in this article should be construed as granting any licence or right for you to use that content. You should consult the third party’s terms and conditions of use in relation to any third-party content. WEP Lawyers disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including liability for negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs you might incur as a result of the information being inaccurate or incomplete in any way. Appropriate legal advice should always be obtained in actual situations.