James Maurice Hoolahan, aged 82 at the date of his death, changed his Will a month prior to his death, leaving nothing to his four surviving children, instead leaving his entire Estate to other relatives who had cared for him.
Mr Hoolahan passed away on 6 April 2011, and on 11 April Mr Hoolahan’s children won an injunction that restrained the Executor from burying their father until after an autopsy was carried out on his body. The siblings also requested for their father be buried next to their mother and brother.
Where a dispute arises as to a deceased’s burial, and these instructions have not been provided for in the Will, the final say in relation to the burial or cremation will be left with the Executor. This is because, although there is no ownership of a person’s body, there is a right of possession in the Executor for the purpose of disposal of a body.
Despite the siblings request for their father to be buried next to their mother and brother after the autopsy, Mr Hoolahan was laid to rest in the same plot as his parents. It would appear that the Executor exercised his right of possession of Mr Hoolahan’s body in this case to override the siblings request.
In order to avoid disputes after death in relation to funeral and burial arrangements, it is important to leave detailed instructions in your Will.
In addition to the injunction, Mr Hoolahan’s children also filed a caveat against any grant or order to administer the Estate. From the facts it appears the children intend to challenge their father’s last Will on the basis he lacked testamentary capacity because of his “frailty, drinking, depression and illness”.
Testamentary capacity is a complex issue and the highest degree of capacity is required for the making of a Will. In order for a Will to be admitted to probate, it must be shown that the willmaker had sound mind, memory and understanding. However, even where a person lacks general testamentary capacity, they may still make a valid Will if they recover capacity to do so temporarily, that is, during a lucid interval.
If the children are successful in proving their father lacked testamentary capacity to make his last Will, the last Will would be invalid and Mr Hoolahan’s estate would be distributed in accordance with his previous Will, of which the children were beneficiaries.
Where there are any concerns about a person’s testamentary capacity, it is essential that medical evidence is sought at the time of obtaining instructions, and also when executing the Will, to prove the willmaker understands the nature and effect of the Will, and their instructions.
In this case, there appears to be evidence from a doctor who saw Mr Hoolahan just before he made his last Will, that he did in fact have full testamentary capacity. If that is accepted by the Court, and there is no other evidence put forward to prove that Mr Hoolahan did not have capacity, the Children may have a difficult time setting aside the will in dispute.
If you have any questions regarding anything above, please don’t hesitate to contact me.
The information provided in this article is for general information and educative purposes in summary form on legal topics which is current at the time it is published. The content does not constitute legal advice or recommendations and should not be relied upon as such. Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation of this article, Wills, Estates and Probate Lawyers (WEP Lawyers) cannot accept responsibility for any errors, including those caused by negligence, in the material. We make no representations, statements or warranties about the accuracy or completeness of the information and you should not rely on it. You are advised to make your own independent inquiries regarding the accuracy of any information provided on this website. WEP Lawyers does not guarantee, and accepts no legal responsibility whatsoever arising from or in connection to the accuracy, reliability, currency, correctness or completeness of any material contained in this article. Links to third party websites or articles does not constitute any endorsement or approval of those sites or the owners of those sites. Nothing in this article should be construed as granting any licence or right for you to use that content. You should consult the third party’s terms and conditions of use in relation to any third-party content. WEP Lawyers disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including liability for negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs you might incur as a result of the information being inaccurate or incomplete in any way. Appropriate legal advice should always be obtained in actual situations.